Sorry for the clickbait. Finals are coming up so it’s time
for a quick and dirty exposition of a few things I learned this semester.
Overall I have conceded that law school is extremely challenging.
Property: Why do Churches Get Special Land Use Privilege?
The Religious Land Use
and Institutionalized Persons Act (Sep. 22, 2000, RLUIPA introduced by Utah
Senator Orrin Hatch) provides protection to religious groups in regards to
governmental zoning and governmental
enforcement of private land covenants.
The federal statute bars the government from imposing a substantial burden on religious land use unless if the government
can show that it has a compelling
interest to impose the burden and that the imposition is the least restrictive means to accomplish
the compelling governmental interest.
James Madison taught that religious freedom is an
unalienable right, superior to the civil authority. First it is necessary to
understand that religion can only be exercised by reason and agency and cannot
be enforced with the sword (or tax garnishments). In contrast, civil authority
relies on social and militant power. The relationship between God and man
exists outside of the purview of the state. The founders were not “creating”
rights in the Constitution…they were “protecting” rights. Man is subject both
to God and Caesar, but subjugation to God is earlier in time and higher in eminence
(See Is
RLUIPA Unfair to Secular Land Users? by my profess.).
Backing up a little it is important to realize that
government does have certain powers (albeit powers given by the people) in
regards to land use (land rights which are endowed on man from a power greater
than government).
Most notably is the eminent
domain power (US Const. 5th Amendment isn’t just about
protecting against self-incrimination) which equips the government with the
ability to take private land for public
use, provided that it pays just
compensation. This power is typically used to build roads, run utility easements, or provide public parks,
hospitals, public buildings etc. The grey area in regards to both physical takings and regulatory takings is the line on what
constitutes public use. The SCOTUS (US Supreme Court) case Kelo v City of New
London found that the government could take land and give it to a private
company because the economic development would serve a public purpose (I know,
scary right?). Overall I would say the taking power of the government has
pretty well been kept in check by state legislation and sound judicial
decisions.
Also of note, local governments have the power to create
zoning ordinances which are designed to protect the public safety, health, and
welfare. Sidenote: One issue we discussed related to this regulating power is “exclusionary zoning” where a city often
tiptoes segregating society along economic lines. These economic lines often
indirectly separate society according to income, race, and background, think:
designating portions of a city to single family residential, others to high
density apartments, etc. It is in local ordinances that certain areas are
designated as appropriate for religious use.
One of the major subsets of local regulation which we
discussed was disputes which have arisen when individuals conduct worship
services in their home. The issues arise when heathen neighbors complain about
the parking or traffic nuisance associated with 25 or so people coming to study
the Quran or sing hymns. Heathen neighbors (joking with that term FYI)
unfortunately do not emphasize the essential
nexus of the issue which the congestion caused. They instead emphasize the
religious practice creating a quasi-church which needs to operate with a
permit.
RLUIPA codifies the protection which individuals have
against the power of government. The burden of proof is on the government to
show that society has a compelling interest in the land being used differently.
North Carolina’s recent religious protection act, let’s just
get my initial thoughts out there: I wish that additional rules didn’t need to
be made but in order to carry out the purpose of the constitution it is better
to legislate through elected officials as opposed to leaving it to unelected
judges. The constitutional rights of gay and transgender persons are certainly
important as well. I however do not believe that in a capitalistic society persons
have a “right” to buy goods from certain vendors. The constitution protects the
people from the government, it doesn’t necessarily protect the people from the
people.
Contracts: Athletes who want to Breach
The USWNT (Mia Hamm and co I think) team and Tom Brady have
been disputing their collective bargaining agreements as of late. Collective
bargaining agreement in this instance is a fancy way to say “contract between
the players and owners”.
The USWNT actually seems to be taking advantage of procrastinating
leadership which didn’t finalize a new official CBA. However there seems to be
ample evidence that enforcing the old CBA shouldn’t be an issue because the
elements of offer, acceptance, consideration, statute of
frauds, and conditions seem to be
present with the agreement to continue recognizing the old CBA. I would advise
USWNT not to breach. While their
cause (equal pay) might be just, the current approach seems to be a losing
battle, but they are smart to advance their pay concerns in an Olympic year
when they are in the public spotlight.
Mr. Brady essentially believes the CBA he signed didn’t
actually give Mr. BadDell the right to suspend Brady for cheating or in the
alternative that it gave too much power to Mr. BadDell. I don’t believe the NFL’s
action was unconscionable but it is
too bad that one player gets to be made an example.
Civil Procedure: Does Information Access Kill the Legal
Profession?
The availability of information via the internet has
threatened many job sectors. Notably, I believe the legal profession has lost
some of its value as a result of information dis-asymmetry. Legal education
likely could afford to move away from the standard brick and mortar model (and
I by “afford” I don’t mean to include the professors who would lose their six
figure incomes). We spent this semester applying the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Like any code, a layman could
look this information up and attempt to apply it. The “lawyer difference” comes
with being able to issue spot among a complex set of facts and then to be able
to know how different rules are connected to each other. As such, I believe
lawyers do have job security and society shouldn’t necessarily want them to become
techies, doctors, or engineers.
International Perspectives: Business Idea: Nonprofit
Which Teaches Comparative Law Course to Muslim Arabs
I keep a long list of business ideas in my notes. Some are
higher on the spectrum (i.e. Uber stole my Carpool.com idea) than others (i.e. gas
station to gas station sell the “Employees must wash hands” signs). My International School for Kids who Don’t
Understand Differences Between American and Islamic Law Good is the
combining of the millennial need to travel the world and the education need for
lower income individuals. Individuals will travel to Jerusalem, Cairo, Amman,
and Istanbul where they will spend two weeks working half-days in local high
schools teaching about American and Islamic legal systems.
The American legal system is, like, pretty straight forward
as I have learned this year (not). Here are some basics of Sharia Law just so you are prepared for the atfaal (children).
Sharia Law is based in the Quran which is the written version of Muhammed
reciting God’s message. The Quran is supplemented by the sunna and hadiths
which are basically examples of how Muhammed applied the principles of the
Quran. Ijma(community consensus) and Qiyas (reasoning) are utilized next in
providing legal decisions. The Qadi (judge) also is assisted by mufti
(scholars) in making rulings. In reality there are few pure Islamic Law
countries with most regions having some influence from French civil code and
British common law. “Islamic Law” in and of itself is too broad of a term
because there are several different schools of jurisprudence. These schools
vary because of different historical and cultural influence and have varying
degrees of conservative and liberal principles.
One of the interesting principles of Sharia Law is its “Conflict of Law” provisions. These
provisions concede rights to Jews and Christians in making their own legal
decisions including decisions on inheritance, divorce, health, and Sabbath
observance.
So basically the kids are going to learn to appreciate their
own legal system and also see the virtues of the American legal system. Western
ideals will be planted in their minds and not just western idols.
No comments:
Post a Comment