Monday, April 24, 2017

My Autonomous Car Stock Portfolio and Legal Implications for the Future of Transportation

Quick and dirty ideas about self-driving cars and attempt to tie into my finals studying. 

Introduction

What’s going to make grandma’s bad hip change from debilitating to hip? When she is the first person on the block to purchase a completely self-driving car.

Technological advances typically take root in younger generations, Snap Inc. has a market value near $24 billion largely because its users are young (and dumb). I-Pad’s and smart phones are second nature to elementary students. Business owners spend millions for the latest software to manage internal operations or expand their market reach. Yet, my 70 year old father needs instructions on sending a picture from his phone. As my father ages our families comfort level with him driving will lessen but we will struggle with trying to give him the autonomy which he deserves and which his mental capacity is capable.

I propose that within the next few years autonomous driving technology will substantially increase in its demand and available supply. Therefore I am proposing a potential investment portfolio which could take advantage of this transportation revolution. My analysis is solely focused on the self-driving portion of these companies public corporations like Google or Apple and close corporations such as Uber. A very basic portfolio is contained at end of post.

The typical joke in my circles is about how bad Utah drivers are…but a strong case can be made that Arizonan’s also would be better off with computers at the helm. The 2015 Arizona crash facts claim that $3.8 billion in economic loss was caused by vehicle crashes. This number gives a generous economic impact to the 895 person who were killed on Arizona roads in 2015 but property damage accounted for nearly $1 billion. The US Department of Transportation 2015 crash stats attribute 94% of vehicle crashes to correctible human error. A lucrative market exists for the entrance of self-driving cars.

Benefits of wide-spread self-driving car use is apparent: Insurance premiums and deductible payments will lower and save citizens substantial money. Self-driving cars themselves contain technology which makes them better, safer drivers than humans. Owners of cars will benefit from a greater ability to multi-task (now you won’t get the stink eye for putting your makeup on while driving). And the efficiency of roads will increase which curbs pollution and fuel costs (hopefully starting with 101 north in mornings, 60 east in afternoons, and downtown 10 whenever).  

Potential Legal Implications

The rise of autonomous vehicles will have an effect on land use in Arizona jurisdictions. States enable counties, cities, and towns to exercise its police power to regulate transportation (US Constitution 10th amendment: authority not contained in the federal government is left to state governments). Local jurisdictions will likely need to be proactive in developing ordinances which do not inhibit the orderly growth of self-driving vehicles. It is likely that legislatures will be able to create ordinance’s which will not be challenged by referenda or preempted by initiative.

Primarily, road use will be affected because flow of cars on roadways will be more efficient. State budgets could significantly be increased by a change in transportation funding. Narrowing of roads or less demand to expand roads will lessen both federal and state funding of roads. Allocation of tax monies will lead to debates on how to use potential revenue surplus. Synonymous with an increase in the popularity of autonomous vehicles is the improvement of technology related to group travel and task-oriented travel. Local mass-transit systems possibly will be affected by more nimble transportation methods (think carpool systems which have algorithms to pick multiple individuals up from home instead of a bus-stop and can take directly to needed location).

Regulation of autonomous vehicles could largely fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government based on the commerce clause. The Department of Transportation would create certain standard requirements and states would adjust those requirements according to their state specific needs. Even though most driving occurs in-state as people go to work and local activities, transportation still has a significant influence on interstate commerce and principles of federalism wouldn’t be affected by general national guidelines.

It is conceivable that potential litigation could arise if seniors owned self-driving cars and their ability to use the vehicles was being curbed by government regulation. The freedom of movement is largely a judicial construct under the privileges and immunities clause of the US Constitution. This privilege has taken on “right” status. Given how it’s been variously used in other cases, freedom of movement possibly could be construed to protect self-driving cars.

The Portfolio

Potential self-driving car focused portfolio. Assuming you get free trades and wont get overly burnt on commission fees. $1,000 investment unless if you are able to get into non-public companies which likely would increase minimum investment amount substantially.

-Apple (Aapl): 1 share at $143
-Vanguard Industrials Index Fund (VIS): 5 shares at $124
-General Motors (GM): 1 share at $33
-Ford (F): 1 share at $11
-Google (Goog): 1 call option at $107
-American Airlines (AAL): Short 1 share at $46
-United Airlines (UAL): Short 1 share at $71
-Medallion (TAXI): Short 10 shares at $3
-Find a way to privately place in companies like AutoNet 2030 (sensors/computers) or Local Drive (engine and body design)
-Hope that Turo does another round of investments and that you’re an sophisticated angel investor who can get a slice (not likely)

Many industries would be affected by growth of the self-driving car. Delivery of materials and crew would be more effective and lead to less subcontractor caused delays. It is likely that self-driving cars would inhibit short-term airline models because persons would be given the opportunity to drive at night and sleep while driving or purely choose to drive 4 hours from door to door instead of driving to airport early and enduring security and hassle of boarding a plane. Taxi, shuttle, and disabled transport companies would likely lose clients.

Another industry which could be impacted is the construction industry. Construction lawyers will have added work as contracts for manufacturing self-driving cars increases and construction of plants devoted to self-driving spring up. There likely will not be changes to basic principles of offer and acceptance or prompt payment, warranty, differing site conditions, etc.

Thanks for reading. Would be glad to hear your thoughts on self-driving car development in general or anything specifically related to this stream-of-thought post.


Note: This does blog does not constitute financial or legal advice. Investment is subject to risk and all investment should be considered in light of appropriate risk management and diversification principles.